Does Your Blood Type Matter Regarding Weight Loss

Cheryl Cole who recently has let people know that her flattering figure is down to something called the blood type diets. And supposedly has had women clamoring to see nutritionists to find out which particular blood type they are.

So they can take advantage like she has and hopefully get the same results or so the theory goes. This particular method of dieting came to light by Peter D’Adamo. He wanted to find out if there was a relationship between how a person’s body digested food and their blood type.

This particular method of eating is about living longer, being healthier, and feeling more energised. These particular method looks at how food interacts with our genes, so you can build an overall picture between the person’s health and nutrition..

The person who was tested in the article had a blood type of A Rhesus negative, she was advised to eat the following types of food for her blood type. This being more towards being a vegetarian, if your blood type is B then you need to be eating the following in your diet, meat, dairy, grains and vegetables.

People with blood type AB need to eat the following, mostly vegetarian with the odd piece of meat, fish, and dairy produce. And if you’re blood type O then you need to eat mainly eat meat in your diet.

When the researcher’s blood test results came back, she was advised not to eat gluten. And just as a quick reminder here her particular blood type was, A Rhesus negative.  She was also told to cut out the following, beans, chickpeas, peanuts and pistachios. She was also told to avoid corn oil certain types of fish, which was haddock, halibut and avoid crustaceans.

After two weeks, she noticed the following, with taking some B vitamin supplements she says that her cravings had stopped and her moods felt a lot more stable and overall she had lost a kilo in weight. Yet another piece of interesting research wouldn’t you say, perhaps sometimes there is more to weight loss and being healthier than we sometimes realise.

What are your thoughts about this?  Any feedback is much appreciated leave a comment below.

Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk

View the Original article

Does What You Eat after You Exercise Matter?

When you are doing your daily workout routine does it really matter what you eat after it? As regards the amount of fat, you will burn. Scientists have now discovered that what you eat afterwards is quite important as to regard as to how much fat you actually burn so it seems that we may not know about actual processes that happen after we have finished our exercises and have something to eat.

What they managed to find out in this particular study is the way that insulin sensitivity actually worked during and after exercise, and what you eat afterwards, which makes the difference. And the greater difference was when you have eaten something with a lower carbohydrate content.

This all tends to centre around something called insulin sensitivity and how your body processes food when you have eaten it. The study noted how the differences were between insulin sensitivity, which, in a nutshell, means whether or not this particular way of converting energy is used by your muscles for energy or not it when you have enhanced insulin sensitivity it is easier for your body to use sugar as fuel.

When the participants in this particular study ate low calorie meals after their exercise this didn’t change their insulin sensitivity so you don’t really need to starve yourself after your exercise routine, even when they matched the amount of calories that they had eaten and burned the same amount off during exercise even this didn’t affect their insulin sensitivity.

The participants involved in the study were nine sedentary men and were in the age group 28 to 30 years old. In conclusion, it was found when the participants ate the lower carbohydrate meals after their exercise than they had better insulin sensitivity, which helps the body to send the fuel to your muscles, which is expended as energy. Yet another useful nugget of information for people trying to lose weight. I must say it’s something that I wasn’t aware of myself.

Source and references :

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100128122142.htm

View the Original article

Does Meal Frequency Matter As Regards Weight Loss

This could be one of the most hotly debated topics as regards losing weight is concerned and it is something I have wondered about myself whether or not how often you eat can make a difference to how much weight you do or don’t lose.

This could be one of the most hotly debated topics as regards losing weight is concerned and it is something I have wondered about myself whether or not how often you eat can make a difference to how much weight you do or don’t lose.

Some people say that eating six small meals a day is better than three meals per day the way I tend to look at this is if you eat six small meals in a day, your blood sugar is far more likely to stay constant. Rather than if you eat three meals and nothing in between. The reason three meals a day was introduced into our lives to fit around the modern-day work ethic.

Where as years ago it probably didn’t matter one of the assumptions about meal frequency is that eating throughout the day you also have a slow at release of nutrition into your body now whether that makes any actual difference I don’t really know.

Another reason for eating food throughout the day at regular intervals is because you are supposed to benefit from the thermic properties of food which the theory goes is this eating food is a chemical process, and you use up calories while you are eating.

However, is there any actual validation to any of this? A study which was put together by the British Medical Journal seems to think. A group of British people were followed who all had the same calorie deficit within their diets. And were split into two groups one group ate small six meals a day and the other group ate three large meals.

After eight weeks the results were in all the participants within both groups all lost significant amounts of weight and had lesserBMI ’s and lower body fat percentage.  However, despite the fact that we are led to believe that eating smaller meals is better the group who ate six meals a day, had no significant differences compared to the other group and there was no improvement in appetite control, etc.

So there goes another dieting myth blown out the water. And to conclude I have a question for you do you actually find that eating small meals throughout the day is better than eating three large meals or doesn’t it make that much difference?

View the Original article